Will this put a Hamper on Sarah Palins Speech?

5 comments

in Elections

BaROCKING ALL THE WAY :

We’ve all said it one time or another, but it has been confirmed, with the top republicans, kissing behind instead of telling us how they REALLY feel, I’m wondering if the Networks are waiting until today to release this Hot Mic Video of Peggy Noonan and Michael Murphy’s disparaging John McCain’s selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his Vice Presidential running mate.
Offshore construction

Quote from mutiny33 on YT….

Just shows you how much the scumbags and the right are lying to us. They all know Palin was the dumbest pick ever. They don’t have the balls to admit it.

Can we say ELECTION IS OVER?

Transcript of what is said on the Video…….

Chuck Todd: Mike Murphy, lots of free advice, we’ll see if Steve Schmidt and the boys were watching. We’ll find out on your blackberry. Tonight voters will get their chance to hear from Sarah Palin and she will get the chance to show voters she’s the right woman for the job Up next, one man who’s already convinced and he’ll us why Gov. Jon Huntsman. (cut away)

Peggy Noonan: Yeah.

Mike Murphy: You know, because I come out of the blue swing state governor world: Engler, Whitman, Tommy Thompson, Mitt Romney, Jeb Bush. I mean, these guys—this is how you win a Texas race, just run it up. And it’s not gonna work. And –

PN: It’s over.

MM: Still McCain can give a version of the Lieberman speech to do himself some good.

CT: I also think the Palin pick is insulting to Kay Bailey Hutchinson, too.

PN: Saw Kay this morning.

CT: Yeah, she’s never looked comfortable about this –

MM: They’re all bummed out.

CT: Yeah, I mean is she really the most qualified woman they could have turned to?

PN: The most qualified? No! I think they went for this—excuse me– political bull**** about narratives –

CT: Yeah they went to a narrative.

MM: I totally agree.

PN: Every time the Republicans do that, because that’s not where they live and it’s not what they’re good at, they blow it.

MM: You know what’s really the worst thing about it? The greatness of McCain is no cynicism, and this is cynical.

CT: This is cynical, and as you called it, gimmicky.

MM: Yeah.

Tagged as: ,

Voter’s Rights Questions.Two of them?

4 comments

in Elections

RacerX :

1.) Do you think we should go back to the rule that one needs to be a property owner to vote? I understand why they changed the rule when they did, but wouldn’t it be a good thing to go back to now that there are so many looking for hand outs with nothing at stake, while on the other hand hard working tax payers risk much, much more?

2.) Stirring the pot even more…During the last election, 40% of women were undecided, then one night on national TV Gore kissed his wife on stage. The next day, polls showed that of those 40% undecided, roughly 75% of them changed threir opinion to vote for Gore…citing his romantic kiss as what changed their mind. I would think this embarrassing for the average woman voter, but with this in mind…should women still have the right to vote?
ultrasound technician

OK, OK, before the hate e-mails come…the 1st question is real for debate, the 2nd is just stirring the pot a bit. Try to have a great day, and don’t let anybody ruin it far ya…including me! ;-)

Tagged as: ,

Possible setback for women’s rights in Iran, your thoughts?

4 comments

in 135

Jimmy :

The whole presidential election was a big farce. Reports suggest widespread cheating and from the interior ministry and voter suppression at some polling stations. Official, government tied, news agencies announced the results hours before the vote count began. It appears that the outcome of this election was determined months in advance behind closed doors. Both Reformist candidates had promised lessening of restrictions on women. Ahmadinejad and hardliners will now claim they have a mandate and could make things even worse. Do our governments in Europe and North America have a responsiblity to put pressure on Iran not to implement new repressive measures? What should Hillary’s response be?
nurse assistant schools

Tagged as: ,

Who is the real Sarah Palin?

8 comments

in Elections

Artemis :

The new VP pick of John McCain has a non-existent track record or worse. This question is here to define the “real” Sarah Palin – a woman that was picked by the McCain camp to dupe women voters. Let’s be real…Sarah Palin stated just last month that she could not identify what the Vice President of the United States is supposed to do on a day to day basis. Can you really trust someone who is completely clueless about the role she is expected to fill? This is serious business, people.
Sarah Palin is NOT for women’s rights and is more George W. Bush in a skirt with her anti-abortion and anti-woman rights viewpoints. She also does not have a strong grasp of the issues (especially those that relate to National Security or Foreign Affairs). Sarah Pallin isn’t just a newbie Governor, she’s completely clueless. Please, don’t waste your vote on the McCain/Palin ticket (Mr. MaGoo and Clueless)…it isn’t worth your time.

Tagged as: ,

Is Obama in Trouble with Female voters and Woman rights activists running against the first female VP? ?

8 comments

in Politics

Obama Bin-Laden Hussein :

Is Obama in rough shape now with female voters? After barely nudging a win over Hillary, and now choosing Biden instead of Hillary for VP.

Are women questioning to switch over to McCain Palin to witness the first female VP ever?

Tagged as: ,

Why won’t women think for themselves regarding Palin?

9 comments

in 309

Michelle :

People in the media keep saying that McCain thinks Hillary voters “must be stupid” to blindly switch to Palin. So any Hillary voters who switch to Palin are as a result considered stupid.

Well, I’m switching from being a Hillary supporter to a Palin supporter, and NOT because I’m stupid. I’m sick of men (and many women) pushing off women’s rights to lead this country into some distant future.

In 1920, women gained the right to vote. It took until 1984 to get a woman on the VP ticket of a major party. It took another 24 years to do it a second time. This time, we can’t let it slip past us.

Tagged as: ,

Do liberal feminists place women’s causes first or America first, when voting?

9 comments

in Politics

Joseph C :

Women have been celebrating the right to vote; but are they voting responsibly? I know some are, but do the sensible women outnumber the liberal feminists, whose main concern is cruasding for the right to murder their unborn, and the like.

Of course, these feminists tend to ruin things for all women, and give them a bad name.

Feminist voters always seem to have a great displeasure for people who are the best for the country. They will always be whining and complaining: WAH, WAH, WAH at the most decent human beings such as Ronald Reagan, and at the present time, John McCain and Sarah Palin.

These feminist types of women will be riding in on their Harleys, whistling and shouting “You Go Girl” for scumbags such as Hillary Clinton, and now most of them are supporting the even more horrible Barack Hussein Obama.

Would the decent women mind sacrificing their right to vote for the sake of saving our nation from the women who put their selfishness first?

Why did women originally not have the right to vote? Was it because of “oppression,” as they all believe? I suggest not, and our founders probably realized that men, on the whole will tend to vote for what’s good for the country. Again, however, I understand there are many great women voters and many terrible men voters; I’m only speaking on the whole.

I have maintained for a long time that the downfall of America will be a DIRECT RESULT of the women’s right to vote.

Do you agree? Respectful answers only, please.

This may also be of interest; please read:

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/894175/should_women_have_the_right_to_vote.html?cat=75

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1011406/is_sarah_palin_more_qualified_for_president.html?cat=75

Tagged as: ,

Why do liberals support radically conservative Islamic states?

8 comments

in Other - Politics & Government

C D :

So liberals are obviously leftist by definition of the political spectrum. If you’re intellectually honest, then you have to admit the state sponsors of terrorism are actually extreme right in their reactionary views to keep their countries centuries behind the rest of the Progressive movement (women’s rights, voters’ rights, legal system, secularization, etc.). So why do the Liberals act like Ahmadinejad is their best friend? Is it just their hatred of the current administration?
a few examples:

Liberals hold Support Palestine rallies vice supporting the only functioning democracy in the middle east, Israel;

Liberals often deny the War on Terror’s necessity, and often echo Michael Moore’s thoughts that 9/11 was either a conspiracy or such a rarity that chances are: he has nothing to worry about;

the ACLU sued an airport recently to establish prayer rooms for only Muslims so that they can honor their prayer schedule, but seek to eliminate prayer and any religious themed articles from every other part of public life…
Dingdong, quite the appropriate name for someone with answers like that… listing a bunch of countries is not providing any evidence of state-sponsored terrorism. You must not understand the word if you think that any actions by the United States are terrorism…
I don’t think it’s senseless to question why those with a purported leftist ideology would support the causes of patently extreme rightists…
Personally, I consider myself libertarian as I am ideologically opposed to the fundamental premise of government controlling anything… Is that the “only valid” spectrum because you say so? The 1-d “political” spectrum is based on the presupposition that government exists and therefore anarchy and libertarians are outside of that spectrum. The political spectrum has socialist communism on one end and fascism on the other. The far left is called “Radical” and the far right is called “Reactionary.” In calling them “radical conservative,” I used the more banal term radical meaning extreme, not politically Radical. If you redefine the spectrum to 2-d with room for anarchy and libertarians, then you’d have the Pournelle Chart… Since you apparently aren’t familiar with the many different spectra out there, here’s a link to start your research: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_spectrum
Fester, if you actually READ what I wrote, wikipedia was not my source at all… It was a recommendation as a start for researching political spectra…

Tagged as: ,

I hope the undecided women voters out there aren’t going to vote for McCain/Palin just because Palin is a ?

11 comments

in Elections

EVH5150 :

woman. I hope you all know out there that Palin is PRO-LIFE and she is a right-wing conservative and doesn’t share the views of the majority of women in the lower 48 (mainland America). You know that right?
I am pro-choice. I believe that women who get pregnant can get an abortion if they so choose to. It is their constitutional right, Roe vs. Wade.

Tagged as: ,

does palin’s firm pro choice ideas hurt her with women voters?

3 comments

in Elections

posuzaku :

I understand that people have different opinions on abortions, however to take away a woman right to control and decide the outcome of her own body is wrong. Don’t get me wrong, I am in the middle when it comes to abortion, but I don’t believe that the government has the right to take away our (being americans) civil rights to choose for ourselves. We don’t ask this about when people CHOOSE to serve in the army, so what is the difference. your thoughts?

Tagged as: ,

Was giving woman the right to vote the worst thing that ever happened to America?

sarahscute2000 : We are WAY to emotional, and vote based on emotions instead of cold hard reality. This is why the Democratic party has moved so far left as to bring us to the edge of destroying out very way of life. If not for women voters we would still be living by strong conservative [...]

Tagged as: ,

9 comments Read the full article →

← Previous Entries